Managed clipping · January to October 2026

Crypto Lark grew from 13 to 76 paying members a month across four clipping campaigns.

Q: What did FORKOFF deliver for Crypto Lark?

Managed clipping, January to October 2026. Four clipping campaigns run back to back turned a long-form back catalogue into a paid community that grew from 13 to 76 members a month.

Q: What was the headline result for Crypto Lark?

13 to 76 paying members a month, measured over January to October 2026. Crypto Lark grew from 13 to 76 paying members a month across four clipping campaigns.

Q: What problem did Crypto Lark need solved?

A large back catalogue of long-form video with its best moments unseen. In March, Instagram carried 76% of the clips but only 42% of the views. About 22% of members do not renew each month, so growth needs a steady flow of new members.

Q: How did FORKOFF run the managed clipping for Crypto Lark?

5,062 clips cut from the catalogue across the two campaigns on record. Clip volume moved toward YouTube Shorts, where a March clip earned 4x the views of a Reel. Campaigns run back to back, the fourth live now, so first-time members keep arriving.

Q: Where do the Crypto Lark numbers come from?

Every figure is read from the client's Whop affiliate records and the campaign records, as of 2026-11-01. Each one is listed with its time window in the sources section of this page.

Q: When is this approach not a fit?

You cannot point the clip traffic at a link we can count.

13 to 76

paying members a month

Four clipping campaigns run back to back turned a long-form back catalogue into a paid community that grew from 13 to 76 members a month.

Map your launch with us

Key facts

Client: Lark Davis (Crypto Lark)
Work and dates: Managed clipping, January to October 2026
Feb to Oct 2026: 13 to 76 paying members per month
across engagements: $0.0024 to $0.0038 reference cost per qualified view (estimate)
Feb to Oct 2026: 13 / 76 paying members, February and October
Feb to Oct 2026: $645.00 / $3,672.35 member payments, February and October
Jan to May 2026: 2,473,372 views across the two campaigns on record (5,062 clips)
2026: 1.0M or more views on the third campaign, at the floor of the 1 to 1.3M range (estimate)
Figures as of: 2026-11-01

13 to 76paying members per month

$0.0024 to $0.0038reference cost per qualified view

Before and after

Campaigns began in January; paying members rose from 13 in February to 76 in October.

February 2026

13 paying members
$645 in member payments
First clips posted in January, almost all on Instagram

October 2026

76 paying members
$3,672 in member payments
Three campaigns finished, the fourth live

5.8x paying members

Efficiency

Four campaigns drew 3.4M+ views and $20,765 in member payments.

3.4M+

views from the three finished campaigns

145

distinct paying members, February to October

$20.8K

member payments over nine months

What we ran

We cut the catalogue, followed the views and kept campaigns running.

01
Cut the catalogue
Episodes became 5,062 clips across two campaigns on record.
02
Follow the views
January ran on Instagram; March moved toward YouTube Shorts.
03
Pay for results
Both campaigns on record spent their $5,000 in full; about 56% paid clips above the bar.
04
Run back to back
Four campaigns since January; members tracked Feb to Oct.

The data

Paying members grew from 13 in February to 76 in October.

Oct: 76

The one dip, in August, came in a month with only 12 first-time members.

The data

Monthly member payments grew 5.7x, from $645 to $3,672.

Feb

645

Mar

1,401

Apr

1,527

May

1,982

Jun

2,556

Jul

3,064

Aug

2,672

Sep

3,246

Oct

3,672

$20,765 in member payments over the nine months.

Planning a launch like Crypto Lark's? We will map the founder anchor, the creator wave and a view target we report honestly.

Book a 30-minute launch call

Check it yourself

Three March clips, still live, hold 81K views.

54,639 viewsOpen the post on X
The campaign's top clip by views
18,724 viewsOpen the post on X
A second angle on the same news cycle, posted a day later
8,245 viewsOpen the post on X
A third clip on a third account

The data

In March, YouTube earned 58% of the views from 24% of the clips.

Channel	Share of views	Share of clips
YouTube Shorts	58%	24%
Instagram Reels	42%	76%

964 views per Short against 221 per Reel.

Efficiency

A qualified view cost $0.0024 to $0.0038; a March Short averaged 964 views.

<$0.004

cost per qualified view, our $0.0024 to $0.0038 reference band

964

average views per YouTube Short in March, against 221 per Reel

In their words

Lark Davis, Founder, Crypto Lark

We kept recording the same long episodes. In March the clips brought 16 new paying members into the community, and our monthly subscription revenue more than doubled.

The evidence

Expect new members every campaign month, and about 22% not to renew.

From March to October, 78% of members paid again the next month and 12 to 21 joined for the first time. Back-to-back campaigns keep new ahead of lost.

Questions about the Crypto Lark clipping

What did FORKOFF deliver for Crypto Lark?

Managed clipping, January to October 2026. Four clipping campaigns run back to back turned a long-form back catalogue into a paid community that grew from 13 to 76 members a month.

What was the headline result for Crypto Lark?

13 to 76 paying members a month, measured over January to October 2026. Crypto Lark grew from 13 to 76 paying members a month across four clipping campaigns.

What problem did Crypto Lark need solved?

A large back catalogue of long-form video with its best moments unseen. In March, Instagram carried 76% of the clips but only 42% of the views. About 22% of members do not renew each month, so growth needs a steady flow of new members.

How did FORKOFF run the managed clipping for Crypto Lark?

5,062 clips cut from the catalogue across the two campaigns on record. Clip volume moved toward YouTube Shorts, where a March clip earned 4x the views of a Reel. Campaigns run back to back, the fourth live now, so first-time members keep arriving.

Where do the Crypto Lark numbers come from?

Every figure is read from the client's Whop affiliate records and the campaign records, as of 2026-11-01. Each one is listed with its time window in the sources section of this page.

When is this approach not a fit?

You cannot point the clip traffic at a link we can count.

Sources and method

Every figure on this page comes from the FORKOFF case-study deck for this engagement, and each one is on a named slide of that deck. Views that are not organic are set aside before we report, and the posts above are public so each number can be checked.

13 to 76paying members per month. Feb to Oct 2026.
$0.0024 to $0.0038reference cost per qualified view. across engagements.
13 / 76paying members, February and October. Feb to Oct 2026.
$645.00 / $3,672.35member payments, February and October. Feb to Oct 2026.
2,473,372views across the two campaigns on record (5,062 clips). Jan to May 2026.
1.0M or moreviews on the third campaign, at the floor of the 1 to 1.3M range. 2026.
$20,764.82paid member payments, 145 distinct members. Feb to Oct 2026.
13, 27, 29, 36, 50, 61, 58, 68, 76paying members by month. Feb to Oct 2026.
12first-time paying members in August. August 2026.
$645.00 to $3,672.35paid member payments per month. Feb to Oct 2026.
58% / 24%YouTube share of views and of clips (742,030 of 1,271,671 views; 770 of 3,164 clips). March campaign.
964 / 221average views per clip, YouTube Shorts and Reels. March campaign.
16first-time paying members in March. March 2026.
$645.00 to $1,400.50member payments, February to March. Feb to Mar 2026.
266 of 342members who paid again the following month, summed March to October. Feb to Oct 2026.
13, 16, 13, 12, 19, 19, 12, 21, 20first-time paying members by month. Feb to Oct 2026.

Written by the FORKOFF launch team. Published 2026-10-19.

Your launch

Send us your catalogue and we will show you where it travels.

A 30-minute call to pick the recordings, the platforms and a monthly member target.

Book a 30-minute launch call

See all case studies

Key facts

Campaigns began in January; paying members rose from 13 in February to 76 in October.

Four campaigns drew 3.4M+ views and $20,765 in member payments.

We cut the catalogue, followed the views and kept campaigns running.

Paying members grew from 13 in February to 76 in October.

Monthly member payments grew 5.7x, from $645 to $3,672.

Three March clips, still live, hold 81K views.

In March, YouTube earned 58% of the views from 24% of the clips.

A qualified view cost $0.0024 to $0.0038; a March Short averaged 964 views.

Lark Davis, Founder, Crypto Lark

Expect new members every campaign month, and about 22% not to renew.

Questions about the Crypto Lark clipping

What did FORKOFF deliver for Crypto Lark?

What was the headline result for Crypto Lark?

What problem did Crypto Lark need solved?

How did FORKOFF run the managed clipping for Crypto Lark?

Where do the Crypto Lark numbers come from?

When is this approach not a fit?

Sources and method

Related

Send us your catalogue and we will show you where it travels.