Skip to content
FORKOFF
Listicle · Updated October 2026

Best AI visibility tools 2026, ranked by measure versus move

The 8 best AI visibility tools in 2026 ranked on one criterion: does the product only MEASURE your presence in AI answers, or does it also MOVE it? Every tool here tracks whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI engines mention and cite your brand. That is the necessary first step, and it is not the same job as changing the answer. The field splits into monitoring platforms that report where you stand (Profound, Peec AI, Scrunch AI), monitoring-plus-optimization platforms that also recommend and draft fixes (Goodie AI, AthenaHQ, Otterly.ai), and the agency work that does the off-page placement which moves the citation (FORKOFF, with Graphite as the broad-agency contrast).

Quick answer

Quick answer: the best AI visibility tools in 2026 are Profound for the deepest measurement across up to nine engines, Goodie AI for the widest surface coverage plus content generation, AthenaHQ for enterprise with SOC 2 and a published 295-dollar entry tier, and Otterly.ai for transparent pricing from 29 dollars a month. Peec AI suits agencies and Scrunch sits at the enterprise end. All of them measure your AI visibility; none move it on their own. If the goal is to change whether engines cite you, a tool shows the gap and an agency closes it through off-page work, which is why FORKOFF ranks first on this page's measure-versus-move criterion while being explicitly an agency, not a tool. Most teams should pair a tool with an agency, not choose between them.

For the branded head-to-heads, read Profound alternatives and Goodie AI alternatives, or see how the AEO agencies rank.

Every entry is a read of that vendor's own public surface on 4 October 2026. Goodie AI is read at higoodie.com, not at the parked goodie.ai domain; Scrunch at scrunch.com, not the redirected scrunchai.com. Where a vendor publishes a rate it is quoted as published; where it does not, the row says so rather than estimating. Check each vendor's own pricing page for current figures before you buy.

Start here

Pick by your situation, not by the rank number

The rank below answers one question. Yours is probably a different one. Four situations cover almost everybody shopping for an AI visibility tool.

SITUATION 01

You just need to measure

You want to see where you stand across AI engines and track it over time. Profound is the deepest, AthenaHQ covers 11-plus LLMs with references, Otterly.ai is the cheapest honest start.

Pick
Profound, AthenaHQ, Otterly.ai
SITUATION 02

You want fixes drafted in the tool

You want recommendations and content, not just a score. Goodie AI adds a Content Studio across up to 13 engines; AthenaHQ ships content-gap recommendations and an Ask Athena copilot.

Pick
Goodie AI, AthenaHQ
SITUATION 03

You run an agency

You report AI visibility across a book of clients and want clean multi-brand tracking with export. Peec AI is built for it; Otterly.ai scales prompts per client.

Pick
Peec AI, Otterly.ai
SITUATION 04

The number has to move

The dashboard keeps showing the same gap and you need it closed, not re-measured. That is off-page work, not another tool. FORKOFF does it and prices on the outcome; Graphite is the broad-agency alternative.

Pick
FORKOFF, Graphite
The 2026 ranking

All 8, in order, with where each one actually wins

Ordered by how much of the AI-visibility job each option owns. Six tools and two agencies. Every entry names the buyer situation it fits and links to a deeper read so you can check the claim.

#1
AgencyPublisher of this list

FORKOFF

Outcome-priced (citation-coverage receipts)Moves the citation

Not a tool, and this page says so in the title: if you want a dashboard to log into, buy one of the seven below. FORKOFF is here as the honest answer to the question a tools roundup eventually raises, which is what you do once the tool has shown you the gap. It is an outcome-priced answer engine optimization agency that does the off-page work which actually changes whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI engines cite you: entity-graph integrity, verbatim positioning, structured answer blocks, and brand-mention placement across the high-authority third-party sources those engines retrieve from. That matters because off-page corroboration is the dominant real-world citation lever: Ahrefs, across 75,000 brands, measured branded web mentions at a 0.664 Spearman correlation with AI visibility, far above Domain Rating and backlinks. FORKOFF runs a roughly 1,000-destination brand-mention placement index and its own first-party Reddit and X data, priced on citation-coverage outcomes with a weekly proof and a 90-day kill clause. It ranks first on this page's one criterion because it is the only option that moves the number rather than charting it, and most teams should pair a tool with it, not choose between them.

Engines
All major, placement not tracking
Strength
Does the off-page placement work that moves citations, priced on the outcome.
Best fit for
Teams whose tool has shown the gap and who need it closed across engines.
See the FORKOFF AEO service
#2
Tool

Profound

Free 7-day trial, Enterprise customMonitoring (category leader)

The category leader on measurement depth and the default enterprise pick. A free 7-day trial tracks ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews at a 50-prompt daily cap, and the Enterprise tier tracks up to nine engines including Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude and Exa, with Agent Analytics for AI-sourced traffic attribution, reusable agent workflows, CSV and JSON export, API access, SSO and SOC 2. If you want the most complete picture of where you stand across engines and have the budget, this is the one. Enterprise pricing is custom and quote-gated, which is the main reason buyers shop around.

Engines
Up to 9 engines
Strength
Deepest prompt dataset, widest engine coverage, agentic traffic analytics.
Best fit for
Enterprises that want the most complete measurement layer.
Profound alternatives, compared
#3
Tool

Goodie AI

Brand $399 to $999/mo, Agency from $275/moMonitor plus optimize plus content

The widest surface coverage here and the most it-does-more-than-monitor of the tools. The product is at higoodie.com; the bare goodie.ai domain is an unrelated listing for sale and is not the product. Goodie tracks up to 13 engines including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, Meta AI, DeepSeek, Grok and Amazon shopping, and adds Optimization Actions, a Content Studio that drafts AI-optimized copy, Brand Command for when an engine describes you wrong, an agentic-commerce suite and a Goodie MCP. The growth agency NoGood appears as a case-study client. Pricing is published: Brand plans run from 399 dollars a month for Core to 999 for Pro, an Enterprise tier tracks up to 13 models, and a separate Agency track starts at 275 dollars a month. Strongest pick if you want monitoring plus self-serve content under one login.

Engines
up to 13 engines
Strength
Widest surface coverage plus optimization and content generation.
Best fit for
In-house teams that want to see the gap and draft fixes in one place.
Goodie AI alternatives, compared
#4
Tool

AthenaHQ

Free tier, Starter $295/mo, Enterprise customMonitor plus optimize (enterprise)

A Y Combinator-backed AEO platform that pairs broad coverage with hard procurement signals. It tracks 11-plus LLMs with share-of-voice analysis, content-gap recommendations, citation-source analysis, sentiment and crisis detection, and an Ask Athena copilot, and it integrates with GA4, Google Search Console and Shopify. It publishes a ladder, a free Essential tier with a 25-dollar credit, Starter at 295 dollars a month for 3,600 credits, and custom Enterprise, is SOC II Type 2 certified and GDPR compliant, and names SoFi, Coinbase and Hearst as clients. A strong enterprise pick when you want recommendations plus references, not just a score.

Engines
11-plus LLMs
Strength
Enterprise trust signals, a published entry price, broad optimization features.
Best fit for
Enterprise and regulated buyers wanting coverage with SOC 2 and references.
Visit AthenaHQ
#5
Tool

Otterly.ai

Lite $29/mo to Premium $489/mo, Enterprise customMonitor plus GEO audit

The price-transparent option and the easiest to trial on a small budget. Otterly publishes its tiers outright: Lite at 29 dollars a month for 15 prompts, Standard at 189 for 100, Premium at 489 for 400, and custom Enterprise above that, with engine add-ons priced separately. It tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot in the base plans, with Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini as add-ons, and ships a GEO audit, a brand visibility index, citation analysis, a Looker Studio connector, and API plus MCP access on higher tiers. The honest starting point for a team that wants to prove the category earns a budget line.

Engines
4 base, 3 add-on
Strength
Published pricing from 29 dollars a month and a real small-team entry point.
Best fit for
SMBs and agencies that want to start cheap and scale prompts as they go.
Visit Otterly.ai
#6
Tool

Peec AI

Not publicly availableMonitor (agency-friendly)

An AI search analytics platform built around clean competitor tracking, which it says serves more than 3,000 brands and agencies and which carries a 4.7 rating on G2. It tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, suggests prompts based on search volumes, compares your ranking against named competitors, identifies the sources citing you, and exports to CSV, Looker Studio or an API. Pricing is not published. The engine list is narrower than Profound or AthenaHQ, so confirm it covers the surfaces your buyers actually use before committing.

Engines
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini
Strength
Clean multi-client tracking workflow for agencies.
Best fit for
Agencies reporting AI visibility across a book of clients.
Visit Peec AI
#7
Tool

Scrunch AI

Not publicly availableMonitor (enterprise, agentic)

An enterprise-oriented AI-visibility and agentic-monitoring platform. Note the domain: scrunchai.com now redirects to scrunch.com, so read the current site. It positions at the enterprise end of the category and does not publish pricing, so expect a demo-and-quote motion rather than a self-serve signup. Ask the same questions of it as of any tool here: which engines, on what cadence, and whether the report tells being cited apart from being merely mentioned.

Engines
Enterprise set
Strength
Enterprise positioning with an agentic monitoring angle.
Best fit for
Enterprise buyers who will run a procurement cycle for a platform.
Visit Scrunch
#8
Agency

Graphite

Not publicly availableResearch-driven growth agency

Included as the contrast point, because it is an agency rather than a tool and some readers of a tools roundup actually want one. Graphite (graphite.io) is a research-driven growth agency that runs AEO alongside SEO and performance marketing, led by Ethan Smith, and it names Webflow, Notion, n8n, Hinge Health, Rippling, MasterClass and Captions among its clients. Its AEO page describes researching real questions and building for the follow-ups competitors miss across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews. Pricing is contact-sales. It is a credible pick when you want a broad growth engine rather than a single AI-visibility wedge, and it shows up in the agency comparison rather than the tool comparison for a reason.

Engines
AEO plus SEO plus performance
Strength
A respected growth agency pairing AEO with SEO and performance across named enterprise clients.
Best fit for
Teams wanting a broad research-driven growth agency, not a monitoring dashboard.
See how the AEO agencies rank
At-a-glance matrix

Eight options, four axes.

Tool or agency, engines tracked, whether it moves citations or only measures them, and published pricing. The same four questions asked of every option.

RankOptionTypeEnginesMeasures or movesPublished pricing
#1FORKOFFAgencyAll major (placement)MovesOutcome-priced, custom
#2ProfoundToolUp to 9MeasuresFree trial, custom
#3Goodie AIToolup to 13 enginesMeasures plus optimize$275 to $999/mo, custom
#4AthenaHQTool11-plusMeasures plus recommendFree, $295/mo, custom
#5Otterly.aiTool4 base, 3 add-onMeasures plus GEO audit$29 to $489/mo
#6Peec AITool3 enginesMeasuresNot public
#7Scrunch AIToolEnterprise setMeasuresNot public
#8GraphiteAgencyAEO plus SEOMoves (broad growth)Not public

Source: each vendor's own public surface, read 4 October 2026. Goodie AI read at higoodie.com; Scrunch at scrunch.com. Where a vendor publishes a rate it is quoted as published; where it does not, the row says Not public rather than estimating. Verify current numbers on the vendor's own pricing page before you buy.

The deciding axis

Why a dashboard shows the gap but does not close it

Every tool on this list solves the same first problem: it tells you whether AI engines mention and cite your brand, for which prompts, on which surfaces, and how you compare to competitors. That is real and necessary, because you cannot manage what you cannot see. The reason the list is ranked on measure versus move is that most teams who shop AI visibility tools eventually hit the same wall, the number is visible and it does not change. A monitoring subscription cannot change it, because the job it sells ends at the report. What changes a citation is off-page work on the sources the engine retrieves from, and that is a different job with a different price shape. Ranking on measure versus move makes that split visible instead of hiding it behind a feature table.

LEVER 01 · OFF-PAGE MENTIONS

The strongest real-world signal

Ahrefs across 75,000 brands put branded web mentions at a 0.664 correlation with AI visibility, far above Domain Rating and backlinks. Models cite the brand named most across the sources they read.

LEVER 02 · ENTITY AND STRUCTURE

Be parseable and resolvable

Entity-graph integrity, verbatim positioning and structured answer blocks decide whether an engine can lift your answer at all. A tool flags the gap; building the structure across properties is the work.

LEVER 03 · FIRST-PARTY DATA

Reach the surfaces engines read

FORKOFF runs its own Reddit and X data products and a clipper network that has processed 5B-plus views, so it can place mentions where engines actually retrieve from, not only chart absence.

LEVER 04 · MEASUREMENT RIGOR

Read the number honestly

AI answers vary run to run, so a single daily sample is noisy, around a 0.37 standard error at one run. Report domains, not one-off URLs, sample across runs, and ask for the denominator behind any share figure.

Those four levers are what moving a citation means on this page. No monitoring tool here runs them, which is not a criticism of the tools, it is a description of where their job ends. Buy the tool to see the gap, and bring in the agency work when the gap has to close. The two are complements, not competitors.

Why these numbers hold up

The measurement discipline behind the FORKOFF entry

A visibility number is only as honest as its sampling, which is the one thing the tools on this list and the agency work both live or die on. AI answers are not deterministic: the same prompt returns a different source set run to run, and the peer-reviewed sampling floor is roughly seven runs per prompt per day aggregated over weeks before a per-prompt claim is stable. FORKOFF reports domains rather than one-off citation URLs, because most URLs appear once and never return while domains stay stable, and it insists on the denominator behind any share figure, because the word share hides four different meanings. We hold ourselves to the same bar we ask a tool to meet, and we never claim a lift we cannot show against a baseline.

See how the managed motion runs on the answer engine optimization service, the Perplexity-specific wedge on the Perplexity SEO service, and score your own page free with the AEO checker.

Reviewed by the FORKOFF AEO team, the operators who run the four-engine citation ledger behind this list.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI visibility tool in 2026?

For pure measurement depth and engine coverage, Profound leads, tracking up to nine engines with the deepest dataset. Goodie AI covers the widest surface set, up to 13 engines, and adds content generation. AthenaHQ is the enterprise pick with SOC 2 and a published 295-dollar entry tier. Otterly.ai is the most price-transparent, from 29 dollars a month. Peec AI suits agencies tracking many clients, and Scrunch sits at the enterprise end. All of them measure your AI visibility. None of them move it on their own, which is the distinction this page ranks on: if the goal is to change whether engines cite you, a tool shows the gap and an agency closes it.

What does an AI visibility tool actually do?

An AI visibility tool runs a set of prompts against AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, records whether and how your brand appears, and reports share of voice, sentiment, position and which sources the engine cited. Better tools track more engines, suggest prompts, compare you to competitors, and some, like Goodie AI and AthenaHQ, recommend fixes and even draft content. What they share is that they measure the current state. The work of changing that state, the off-page corroboration that most strongly predicts citation, sits outside what a monitoring subscription does.

How is this list ranked?

By one stated criterion: whether the product only measures your AI visibility or also moves it. A tool that reports where you stand sits below a tool that also recommends and drafts fixes, which sits below an agency that does the off-page placement work that changes whether engines cite you. It is not ranked by popularity or dashboard polish. On engine coverage or dataset depth alone Profound would lead the tools, and the entries say so. FORKOFF ranks first only because the criterion is measure versus move, and it is explicitly an agency, not a tool.

Do I need an AI visibility tool or an agency?

Most teams need both, in sequence. You need a tool first, because you cannot manage what you cannot see, and a tool is the cheapest honest way to measure where you stand across engines and track whether anything changes. You need an agency when the tool keeps showing the same gap and nobody on the team has the time or the off-page reach to close it. Buying an agency without a measurement layer leaves you unable to prove the lift; buying a tool and expecting the number to move on its own leaves you paying to watch a red metric. Pair them: a tool to measure, an agency to move.

How much do AI visibility tools cost in 2026?

The transparent end starts around 29 dollars a month: Otterly.ai publishes Lite at 29, Standard at 189 and Premium at 489, AthenaHQ publishes a free Essential tier and a Starter plan at 295 dollars a month, and Goodie AI publishes Brand plans from 399 and an Agency track from 275. The remaining enterprise platforms, Profound, Peec AI and Scrunch, are quote-gated with no public number, so you need a demo to compare those. Read each vendor's own pricing page before committing, because tiers and credit models in this category change often and any figure in a third-party listicle, including this one, ages faster than the pricing page does.

Is FORKOFF an AI visibility tool?

No, and the page says so plainly. FORKOFF is an outcome-priced answer engine optimization agency, not a dashboard you log into. It appears on this list as the answer to the question a tools roundup raises: once a tool has measured the gap, what closes it. FORKOFF does the off-page citation work, entity and structure engineering plus brand-mention placement on the sources engines retrieve from, priced on citation-coverage outcomes with a weekly proof and a 90-day kill clause. If you only want to measure, buy a tool above. If you want the metric moved, that is the agency job.

The measured lane

Buy the tool. Then move the number.

A tool shows you where you stand in AI answers, and you should have one. When the number has to change and a dashboard keeps showing the same gap, that is off-page work, and it is what FORKOFF is built for. Talk to a strategist before you renew another seat.

Browse all FORKOFF comparisons
" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
Testimonials
“
The qualification ledger changed how we report to the board. Real attention, verified weekly, not dashboard vanity.
G

Growth lead

Series A, 2026, AI infrastructure startup

Brand
We went from guessing pipeline attribution to seeing it in a weekly audit ledger. Finance signed off on the next quarter before the first one ended.
M

Marketing director

Mid-market, 2026, B2B SaaS platform

Brand
FORKOFF ran our conference activation across three cities in one quarter. Side events, content capture, post-event distribution. One operator, one ledger.
H

Head of events

Three cities, one quarter, DevTools company

Partner
99.71%Sustained legitimacy rate
3.4xRetained attention vs prior agency
250+Qualified introductions
Featured engagements
The index

Other agencies we've audited

24 of 67 comparisons