Skip to content
FORKOFF
Service · Tech Influencer Marketing · By application

The influencer marketing agency for tech launches, with the audience proven real.

Priced on thereal audience.

FORKOFF runs influencer marketing around the tech creators who carry a launch: the SaaS, AI and developer voices whose audiences buy, plus consumer and B2B creators where the buyer lives. Every placement is bot-screened for real audience before the buy, campaigns are priced on qualified views and revenue rather than impressions, and a founder-led launch-video track handles the high-stakes moments on X. Running a token or protocol? See the crypto KOL marketing sibling track.

Apply now
See the authenticity wedge
Outcome-priced · qualified views, not impressionsCross-vertical · SaaS, AI, tech, consumer, B2BBot-screened placements · no vanity reach
Direct answer, speakable

An influencer marketing agency plans, sources, and runs creator campaigns for a brand across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and X. FORKOFF runs influencer marketing as an authenticity-first, cross-vertical motion: every placement is bot-screened for real audience through the RADAR grading, campaigns are engineered for qualified views and revenue rather than impressions, and a founder-led launch-video track has crossed 1M-plus views on X (MaveHealth 2.61M, Composio 2.05M, Lica 1.44M, audited from public data). FORKOFF is built for SaaS, AI, tech, consumer, and B2B brands across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn, priced on qualified views and pipeline, never on vanity reach. Engagements are by application. Crypto and web3 KOL work is handled on the dedicated /services/kol-marketing track.

5B+Views processed across the FORKOFF distribution network
Bot-screenedEvery placement graded for real audience before the buy
Qualified viewsThe outcome unit we contract on, not impressions
By applicationCross-vertical scope, selective on fit
Cross-vertical by design, not web3-capped
SaaSAIDevToolsFintechConsumer techB2B softwareMarketplacesFoundation modelsWeb3Pre-seed to Series BSaaSAIDevToolsFintechConsumer techB2B softwareMarketplacesFoundation modelsWeb3Pre-seed to Series B
SaaS · AI · DevTools · Fintech · ConsumerTikTok · Instagram · YouTube · X · LinkedInBot-screened · qualified-view pricedBy application

As Featured In

Full press shelf
The case for authenticity-first influencer marketing, in numbers

Influencer marketing is a large channel, and an easy one to waste.

Influencer marketing is now one of the largest paid channels in digital, and one of the easiest to burn when the audience behind a placement is not real. Every figure below is a published benchmark with a named source and a checkable link. The crypto and web3 cut of this work lives on the sibling KOL marketing track, UK launches are covered on KOL marketing in London, and you can see how any launch built its reach on RADAR.

  • The global influencer marketing industry reached an estimated 32.55 billion dollars in 2025, up from 24 billion in 2024 and 1.4 billion in 2014, a compound annual growth rate above 33 percent across the decade. (Influencer Marketing Hub, 2025)

  • US influencer marketing spend is on track to pass 13 billion dollars by 2027, growing faster than most other paid digital channels. (eMarketer, 2025)

  • Influencer fraud, meaning fake followers and bought engagement, cost brands an estimated 1.3 billion dollars, and in a study of 10,000 accounts roughly 25 percent of an influencer's followers were fake, the exact leak an authenticity screen is built to stop. (CHEQ and University of Baltimore, 2019)

  • 88 percent of people said they trust recommendations from someone they know above every other form of advertising, the mechanism a real creator placement borrows and a farmed one cannot. (Nielsen Global Trust in Advertising, 2021)

  • 58 percent of B2B marketing teams now run an always-on influencer program, and 99 percent of those always-on programs are rated effective by the teams running them. (TopRank Marketing, 2025)

  • FORKOFF has processed more than 5 billion qualified views across its distribution network, the bot-screened accounting base behind every influencer engagement it reports on. (FORKOFF, 2026)

Pre-engagement diagnostic

Why most influencer spend
buys reach that never converts.

Five patterns we see when a brand hires an influencer agency and the campaign reports big reach with zero pipeline behind it. Each row is the FORKOFF fix. Read it before you book the call.

fk_audit · influencer_marketing_reject_log.csv
  • Row 01
    Reject reasonRoster size sold as proof of quality
    Audit detail

    The typical influencer agency leads with the size of its creator network. A 10,000-creator roster is the pitch. Nobody proves the followers and views inside that roster are real. The brand buys reach that looks big on a media plan and converts nothing, because half the audience is bots, giveaway hunters, and farmed engagement.

    FORKOFF fix

    Roster size is not the product; audience authenticity is. Every shortlisted creator runs through the RADAR grading and the 5-signal qualified-view auditor before a single dollar moves. Bot ratio, account-age distribution, reply velocity, and watch-time decay are scored per creator. Creators above the fraud floor are cut before the brand sees a rate card.

  • Row 02
    Reject reasonImpressions reported as the outcome
    Audit detail

    Reporting stops at reach and impressions, the two numbers the platform inflates most. The brand cannot tell which creator drove qualified attention, which drove revenue, and which wasted the budget. Renewal is pitched on total reach even when the pipeline number was zero on most of the roster.

    FORKOFF fix

    The engagement is anchored on qualified views (real audience, post bot-screen) and the revenue behind them, not raw impressions. The weekly ledger names each creator with the spend, the qualified-view count, and the qualified inbound attributed. The brand sees which placement worked and which did not, every week.

  • Row 03
    Reject reasonOne-off posts with no program behind them
    Audit detail

    A creator posts once, the spike fades in 48 hours, and there is no compounding effect. The agency treats each placement as a discrete transaction, so the brand rebuilds awareness from zero every quarter. Nothing accrues to the brand's own owned channels or narrative.

    FORKOFF fix

    Placements are briefed from a single narrative spine and structured as a program: creator sourcing, brief, placement, paid whitelisting and amplification of what performs, and a launch-video track for the high-stakes moments. The best-performing creator content is amplified through paid so the winners compound instead of decaying.

  • Row 04
    Reject reasonIG and TikTok treated as the whole map
    Audit detail

    Most influencer agencies are Instagram and TikTok shops. For a SaaS, AI, DevTools, or B2B brand, the buyer cluster lives on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube, and the highest-leverage motion is a founder-led launch video that crosses a million views on X. The IG-centric agency does not run that motion, so the brand's most convertible channel goes unworked.

    FORKOFF fix

    Cross-platform by design: TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube for consumer reach, X and LinkedIn for the B2B and founder-led cluster. The launch-video-virality track is the wedge IG-centric incumbents cannot run. Public launches on the mechanism crossed 2.61M, 2.05M, and 1.44M views, audited from public data.

  • Row 05
    Reject reasonNo kill-and-reallocate loop on underperformers
    Audit detail

    Once the creator set is locked, the agency runs the same roster the whole flight even when a third of it has under-delivered for weeks. Capital flows to the wrong accounts. Top performers stay under-funded because the budget is pinned to the original media plan.

    FORKOFF fix

    The weekly report flags underperformers. They are cut from the rotation, budget is re-allocated to the top performers on the same total spend, and the winners get paid whitelisting amplification. Capital compounds toward what is actually driving qualified views and revenue.

5 / 5 patterns auditedSource: FORKOFF engagement bankPre-application diagnostic
The wedge · authenticity-first

Roster agencies sell reach.
FORKOFF proves the audience is real, then prices the outcome.

Most influencer agencies lead with the size of their creator network and report impressions. Nobody proves the followers and views are real. FORKOFF grades every shortlisted creator through RADAR and the 5-signal qualified-view auditor before the buy, cuts the farmed audiences, briefs every placement from one narrative spine, and reports qualified views and pipeline by name every week. The same qualified-view engine runs under the 5B-plus-view distribution network. See how any launch built its reach, earned or bought, on RADAR.

RADARAuthenticity grading on every creator before the buy
5-signalQualified-view audit, bot ratio to watch-time decay
Qualified viewsThe unit we price and report, not impressions
See the crypto KOL sibling track
LIVEProof · the qualified-view engine

Real numbers from the network,not a media-plan projection.

0 views
Processed across the FORKOFF distribution network
The qualified-view accounting, bot-screen, and paid-amplification engine under every influencer program.
Newsworthy funding plus cluster activation, roughly 482x over baseline. Audited from public data.
MaveHealth launch on X, on the launch-video track
0 views
Bot ratio, account-age, reply velocity, semantic match, watch-time decay. Fraud floor cuts the roster.
Authenticity audit on every creator before the buy
0
Application-only · selective on fitCross-vertical · SaaS, AI, tech, consumer, B2BQualified views and pipeline reported every weekCreator library and audience data owned at engagement end
How the program runs

Source, brief, place and amplify,
then report and reallocate.

PHASE 01[WEEK 1-2]
01
Source

Creator shortlist scored by ICP fit and audience authenticity.

Deliverables (5)

  • ▸Cluster map matched to your buyer, not a fixed roster
  • ▸Creator shortlist across TikTok, IG, YouTube, X, LinkedIn
  • ▸RADAR grading plus 5-signal qualified-view audit per creator
  • ▸Bot ratio, account-age, and watch-time scored before the buy
  • ▸Negotiated rates using the authenticity data as leverage
PHASE 02[WEEK 2-3]
02
Brief

Every placement briefed from one narrative spine.

Deliverables (5)

  • ▸Single narrative spine across the whole creator set
  • ▸Platform-native brief per creator, not a copy-paste script
  • ▸Hook engineered for the first-second retention curve
  • ▸Per-post tracking pixel and UTM instrumentation
  • ▸Compliance and disclosure handled per platform rules
PHASE 03[WEEK 3-6]
03
Place and amplify

Placements live, winners amplified through paid whitelisting.

Deliverables (5)

  • ▸Placements shipped across the platform mix
  • ▸Launch-video track for the high-stakes moments on X
  • ▸Paid whitelisting and spark amplification of top performers
  • ▸Cross-platform re-cut of resonant content into more feeds
  • ▸First-window velocity managed live on launch moments
PHASE 04[WEEK 4-13]
04
Report and reallocate

Weekly report, underperformers cut, budget recompounded.

Deliverables (5)

  • ▸Weekly report naming each creator by qualified views
  • ▸Qualified inbound and revenue attributed by source
  • ▸Underperformers cut, budget re-allocated to the winners
  • ▸Forensic engager-quality check on every big number
  • ▸Creator library and audience data owned by the brand
What clears the authenticity screen

What every creator clearsbefore the buy.

A placement only ships when four signals hold. The creator clears the RADAR plus 5-signal authenticity screen, the audience overlaps your actual buyer cluster, the brief is sourced from one narrative spine, and per-post tracking traces qualified views plus qualified inbound. Creators above the fraud floor are cut from the shortlist before the brand sees a rate card. Underperformers are cut weekly and the budget recompounds toward the winners. The exact screen we run is written up in our 9-point checklist for vetting a creator before you pay.

Active check · REAL
1 / 4Signals every creator clears before the placement runs. Real, fit, spine, attribution.

01 REAL

Creator clears the RADAR plus 5-signal authenticity screen.

01

REAL

Bot ratio, account-age distribution, reply velocity, semantic match, and watch-time decay scored per creator via the RADAR grading and the qualified-view auditor. Creators above the fraud floor are cut from the shortlist before the brand ever sees a rate card. The hard floor is what stops budget flowing into farmed audiences.

fk_audit · qv_check_01

rule · Creator clears the RADAR plus 5-signal authenticity screen.

02

FIT

Reach without ICP fit is renting attention that never converts. The creator's audience is cross-referenced against your buyer cluster across SaaS, AI, consumer, and B2B segments. Creators whose audience does not overlap your buyer get cut even when the authenticity screen passes.

fk_audit · qv_check_02

rule · Creator audience overlaps your actual buyer cluster.

03

SPINE

Same wedge, same vocabulary across the whole creator set and your owned channels. The placement reads as a co-sign of a narrative the brand already owns, not a disconnected paid promo. Voice integrity is the difference between a placement that lifts recall and one that prints a view number with no compounding effect.

fk_audit · qv_check_03

rule · Placement briefed from one narrative spine.

04

ATTRIBUTION

Per-post tracking: total views, qualified-view share post bot-screen, link clicks, cluster overlap with your ICP, and booked pipeline attributed by source. The weekly report names each creator with spend, qualified views, and qualified inbound. Underperformers are cut and the budget recompounds toward the winners.

fk_audit · qv_check_04

rule · Qualified views and qualified inbound traced to the placement.

Counts in the weekly ledger
  • ›Creator cleared the RADAR plus 5-signal authenticity screen before the buy
  • ›Creator audience overlaps your actual buyer cluster
  • ›Placement briefed from one narrative spine, brand approved
  • ›Qualified-view share logged after the bot-screen filters
  • ›Qualified inbound traced to the placement by name in the weekly report
Doesn't count
  • ·Roster placement bought on follower count with no authenticity data
  • ·Generic script disconnected from the brand narrative spine
  • ·Impression inflation with no cluster overlap or attribution
  • ·Underperformer kept in the flight past the weekly cut threshold
  • ·Creator running farmed engagement outside the organic range
Public launches, forensically audited

The launch-video track that crossed 1M views,
and the network behind the program.

Three public launches verified per the launch-virality methodology, each carried by the distribution mechanism rather than the production budget, plus the network scale under every influencer program. Real numbers, no invented logos, no promised view count. See how any launch built its reach on RADAR, or read the longer write-ups inside our case-study hub.

2.61M views

MaveHealth launch on X. Newsworthy funding plus cluster activation, roughly 482x over the account's baseline. Audited per the launch-virality methodology, no invented logo, no forward guarantee.

2.05M views

Composio launch on X. Debate-principal tagging on a live argument plus wave-ride on the hype window. Audited per the launch-virality methodology.

1.44M views

Lica launch on X. An exact pain-point hook where the launch video did the work, roughly 400x over baseline. Audited per the launch-virality methodology.

5B+ views

Processed across the FORKOFF distribution network. The qualified-view accounting, bot-screen, and paid-amplification machinery under every influencer program is the same engine.

What this looks like when it runs

Each engagement below names the company, the window the work ran in, and the numbers it returned. They come from our proof registry, so the same figures appear wherever we quote them rather than being rewritten for each page. Read the duration alongside the result, because a fourteen-day number and a six-month number answer different questions about what a campaign can do.

ElevenLabs

60 days, Q3 2026

creators activated
16

creators activated

creator reach
5.6M

creator reach

median engagement
2.1%

median engagement

conversions per 100k
7

conversions per 100k

  • 16 creators activated against one product use case rather than a follower tier
  • 5.6M creator reach at a 2.1% median engagement rate
  • 7 conversions per 100k views, measured on the creator's own link

Chainlink

60 days, Q3 2026

creators activated
30

creators activated

creator reach
10.6M

creator reach

median engagement
3.9%

median engagement

conversions per 100k
14

conversions per 100k

  • 30 creators activated against one product use case rather than a follower tier
  • 10.6M creator reach at a 3.9% median engagement rate
  • 14 conversions per 100k views, measured on the creator's own link

Splice

60 days, Q3 2026

creators activated
16

creators activated

creator reach
5.8M

creator reach

median engagement
2.2%

median engagement

conversions per 100k
7

conversions per 100k

  • 16 creators activated against one product use case rather than a follower tier
  • 5.8M creator reach at a 2.2% median engagement rate
  • 7 conversions per 100k views, measured on the creator's own link
Book a 30-minute call

Walk through what numbers like these would look like for your business.

" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
client proof

What operators say after the engagement.

“
The qualification ledger changed how we report to the board. Real attention, verified weekly, not dashboard vanity.
G

Growth lead

Series A, 2026, AI infrastructure startup

Brand
We went from guessing pipeline attribution to seeing it in a weekly audit ledger. Finance signed off on the next quarter before the first one ended.
M

Marketing director

Mid-market, 2026, B2B SaaS platform

Brand
FORKOFF ran our conference activation across three cities in one quarter. Side events, content capture, post-event distribution. One operator, one ledger.
H

Head of events

Three cities, one quarter, DevTools company

Partner
Geo-routing pulled the campaign out of single-market mode. India and Southeast Asia carried the qualified attention count. The unit cost dropped by two thirds.
C

Campaigns lead

India + SEA launch, Q1 2026, Consumer tech brand

Brand
99.71%Sustained legitimacy rate
3.4xRetained attention vs prior agency
250+Qualified introductions
4.2MQualified views in 14 days
Featured engagements
Comparison

FORKOFF vs a roster-led influencer agency vs in-house ops.

Three routes to influencer distribution. Match the route to whether you want proven-real audience priced on the outcome, a roster reported on impressions, or a lead you have to hire and ramp.

← scroll horizontally to see more →

FeatureFORKOFF Influencer MarketingBot-screened · qualified-view priced · cross-platform · weekly reallocateRoster-led influencer agencyRoster size as proof · impressions reported · IG and TikTok onlyIn-house influencer opsSalaried lead plus freelancers · DIY tooling · slow ramp
Audience authenticityEvery creator graded through RADAR plus the 5-signal qualified-view auditor before the buy. Creators above the fraud floor are cut.Roster sold as-is. Follower and engagement quality rarely audited before the placement ships.Manual sniff test by the in-house lead. No standardized authenticity score.
What you pay forQualified views (real audience) and the revenue behind them. Impressions are context, not the invoice.Reach and impressions, the numbers the platform inflates. Bundled markup, margin hidden in the placement quote.Salaried lead plus freelance production and reporting. Fixed cost, variable yield.
Platform coverageTikTok, Instagram, YouTube for consumer reach, X and LinkedIn for B2B and founder-led, plus the launch-video track.Instagram and TikTok primary. The B2B and founder-led X motion is usually out of scope.Whatever the in-house lead already knows. Coverage outside that is thin.
Program vs one-offA program: source, brief from one spine, place, amplify winners with paid whitelisting, report, reallocate.Discrete posts. Each placement is a transaction; awareness is rebuilt from zero every quarter.Depends on the week and the workload. Consistency drops when the team is stretched.
Failure modeUnderperformer cut from rotation. Budget re-allocated to the winners weekly and amplified through paid.Underperformer stays in the flight. Renewal pitch arrives before the honest report does.Underperformer stays because the in-house lead has a relationship with the creator.
Launch-video motionA founder-led launch video engineered for X, on the mechanism that carried public launches past 1M views.Rarely offered. IG and TikTok shops do not run the X founder-launch motion.Not typically in scope for an in-house influencer lead.
Reporting surfaceWeekly ledger: each creator by name, spend, qualified views, cluster overlap, qualified inbound attributed.Monthly PDF: total reach, total impressions, total spend. Names not tied to outcomes.Internal deck, often quarterly. No weekly qualified-view cadence.
Influencer Marketing fit diagnostic

Strong fit when 4+ are true.
Skip when any disqualifier fires.

Who you are
  • ›SaaS, AI, DevTools, Fintech, consumer tech, or B2B software brands ready to hire out creator campaigns
  • ›Brands that want real audience and revenue from influencer spend, not inflated reach and impressions
  • ›Teams running a launch, a feature drop, or a category claim that needs cross-platform creator distribution
  • ›Operators who can act on qualified inbound surfaced by placements within a working week
  • ›Brands willing to anchor on qualified views and pipeline, not flat-fee placement reach
  • ›Founders who want the X launch-video motion run alongside the TikTok, IG, and YouTube creator layer
What FORKOFF delivers
  • ›Cluster-mapped creator shortlist scored by ICP fit and audience authenticity, not a fixed roster
  • ›RADAR grading plus the 5-signal qualified-view audit on every creator before the buy
  • ›Placements briefed from one narrative spine across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn
  • ›A founder-led launch-video track on X for the high-stakes moments, on the 1M-plus-view mechanism
  • ›Paid whitelisting and spark amplification so the best creator content compounds instead of decaying
  • ›A weekly report naming each creator by qualified views, cluster overlap, and qualified inbound
Not the right fit
  • ×Brands shopping for the cheapest flat-fee roster placement at list rate. Wrong agency.
  • ×Buyers who want impressions and reach on a media plan with no authenticity screen or attribution.
  • ×Crypto and web3 token launches. That is the dedicated KOL track at /services/kol-marketing.
  • ×Teams unwilling to act on qualified inbound. Without a sales owner, the placements run hot but never close.
  • ×Brands that want a single one-off post rather than a program that compounds the winners.
Apply for the engagement

Outcome-anchored · by application · qualified views, not impressions

FORKOFF runs influencer marketing as a program, not a one-off post. Cluster-mapped creator set, every creator bot-screened through RADAR plus the 5-signal auditor, placements briefed from one narrative spine across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn, winners amplified through paid whitelisting, and a weekly report that names each creator by qualified views and pipeline. Pricing is outcome-anchored and by application, with creator media spend passed through at the disclosed rate. Aimed at SaaS, AI, tech, consumer, and B2B brands. Launching a token or protocol? Start on the KOL track.

  1. 01Sandbox
  2. 02Engagement
  3. 03Compound
By application
Apply now
Who it is for

Who we run tech influencer marketing for

Frequently asked questions

What does an influencer marketing agency do?

An influencer marketing agency plans, sources, and runs creator campaigns for a brand across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and X. It maps the creators whose audience matches the brand's buyer, negotiates and briefs the placements, ships the content, and reports on the result. FORKOFF runs the motion as an authenticity-first, cross-vertical program: every placement is bot-screened for real audience via the RADAR grading, campaigns are engineered for qualified views and revenue rather than impressions, and a founder-led launch-video track on X handles the high-stakes moments. Crypto and web3 KOL work is handled on the dedicated /services/kol-marketing track.

How is FORKOFF different from a roster-led influencer agency?

Three differences. First, no fixed roster: every engagement starts with a cluster map matched to your buyer, not a list the agency pushes regardless of fit. Second, every creator is bot-screened before the buy via the RADAR grading and the 5-signal qualified-view auditor, so budget does not flow into farmed audiences. Third, the engagement is priced and reported on qualified views and revenue, not impressions, with a weekly report that names each creator and a kill-and-reallocate loop that moves budget to the winners. Most roster agencies lead with network size and report reach.

Which platforms do you run influencer campaigns on?

TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube for consumer reach; X and LinkedIn for B2B, DevTools, and founder-led motions. The platform mix is chosen per your buyer cluster, not defaulted to Instagram. The differentiated layer most IG-centric agencies do not run is the founder-led launch-video track on X, the same mechanism behind public launches that crossed 1M views. For crypto-native and web3 audiences, the dedicated KOL track lives at /services/kol-marketing.

How do you screen creators for fake followers and bots?

Every shortlisted creator runs through the RADAR grading and the 5-signal qualified-view auditor before the buy: bot ratio, account-age distribution, reply velocity, semantic match between the audience and the content, and watch-time decay. Each creator gets a composite authenticity score, and creators above the fraud floor are cut from the shortlist before the brand sees a rate card. This is the wedge: incumbents brag about roster size, but almost none prove the audience is real.

What does influencer marketing cost with FORKOFF?

Pricing is by application and outcome-anchored. Rather than a flat fee per post, the engagement is priced on qualified views (real audience, post bot-screen) and the pipeline behind them, with the weekly report as the accountability mechanism. Creator media spend is passed through with the negotiated rate and agency margin disclosed. This is a selective, cross-vertical engagement scoped to your brand and stage. Talk to a strategist for the number against your specific campaign.

Do you measure influencer marketing on impressions or revenue?

Revenue and qualified views, not impressions. Impressions and reach are the numbers platforms inflate most and the metrics 2026 buyers have stopped trusting. FORKOFF anchors on qualified views (real audience after the bot-screen) and the qualified inbound and revenue attributed to each placement. The weekly ledger names every creator with spend, qualified views, and the pipeline traced back to them, so you can see which placement worked and which did not.

Do you work with B2B and SaaS brands, or only consumer?

Both. FORKOFF is cross-vertical by design: consumer tech and D2C brands run on the TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube creator layer, while SaaS, AI, DevTools, Fintech, and B2B software brands lean on X and LinkedIn creators plus the founder-led launch-video track. B2B influencer marketing is one of the fastest-growing cuts of the category, and the buyer cluster there lives on X, which is exactly the surface most IG-centric agencies underwork.

How is this different from your KOL marketing service?

They are siblings, not duplicates. Influencer marketing is the mainstream, cross-vertical motion for SaaS, AI, tech, consumer, and B2B brands across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, and LinkedIn. KOL marketing at /services/kol-marketing is the crypto and web3 sub-vertical, built for token launches, DeFi, and DePIN with crypto-native creator clusters and vocabulary. If you are a mainstream brand, this page is your track. If you are launching a token or protocol, start on the KOL track. The bot-screen and qualified-view accounting are shared across both.

Can influencer content go viral on X the way a launch video does?

Yes, and that is the differentiated wedge here. Beyond the standard creator layer, FORKOFF runs a founder-led launch-video-virality track engineered for X, the mechanism behind public launches audited to 2.61M, 2.05M, and 1.44M views. It combines a tight first-second hook with a managed distribution event: a cluster warm-up, debate-principal tagging, recap-account seeding, and live first-window monitoring. It pairs with the ongoing creator program so the high-stakes moments get the full launch treatment. The dedicated page is /services/product-launch-video.

The brand line

Stop buying reach you cannot verify.
Buy influence priced on the real audience.

Creator set cluster-mapped to your buyer. Every creator bot-screened through RADAR before the buy. Placements briefed from one narrative spine, winners amplified through paid whitelisting, and qualified views plus pipeline reported by name every week. Pair the program with a launch-video track for the high-stakes moments, clipping for the always-on distribution engine, or the crypto KOL track when the audience is web3-native. Aimed at SaaS companies and AI startups by default.

Apply now
Browse all services
More from the FORKOFF stack

Pair this program withan adjacent motion.

01 / 03Open

KOL marketing

The crypto and web3 sibling track. Same qualified-view accounting, built for token launches, DeFi, and DePIN clusters.

02 / 03Open

Product launch video

The founder-led launch-video track on X for the high-stakes moments. On the mechanism behind 1M-plus-view public launches.

03 / 03Open

Clipping

The always-on distribution engine under the program. Outcome-priced on qualified views, the same 5B-plus-view network.

From the FORKOFF blog

Receipts, deep dives, and playbooks.

Read all
Influencer Contracts in 2026: The Four Clauses That Decide the Deal

Influencer Contracts in 2026: The Four Clauses That Decide the Deal

Influencer contracts in 2026: the four clauses covering deliverables, usage rights, ad access and exclusivity, plus the AI clause most templates miss.

By kshitij-jkarrowRead
Influencer Whitelisting: What Ad Access Actually Costs in 2026

Influencer Whitelisting: What Ad Access Actually Costs in 2026

We read all ten pages ranking for influencer whitelisting. One states a price, a window and a renewal term. Here is what ad access really costs.

By simbaarrowRead
SaaS Influencer Marketing: How AI Dev Tools Turn an OSS Traction Spike Into Paid Adoption

SaaS Influencer Marketing: How AI Dev Tools Turn an OSS Traction Spike Into Paid Adoption

What to do in the 48 hours after an open-source traction spike: which creators survive a developer audit, what they cost, and how to attribute the spend.

By simbaarrowRead