Updated Jul 1, 2026
An organic launch and an amplified one look different in the numbers. Across RADAR's corpus of 30 tracked launches, about 110.4 million combined views from Oct 2025 to Jun 2026, organic reach holds near or below 500 views per like, while amplified reach climbs into the thousands. RADAR, FORKOFF's launch-intelligence surface, reads the gap as a distribution-amplified signature, using aggregate bands and naming no single launch.
Per our own views-to-likes benchmark of 5,375 creators, an engagement ratio outside the observed band is the cheapest tell that a launch was amplified. FORKOFF Views-to-Likes Benchmark 2026
Read together, RADAR's corpus of 30 launches, about 110.4 million combined views from Oct 2025 to Jun 2026, shows organic reach is the exception, not the rule, among launches large enough to track. Only 10 of the 30 read as organic; the other 20 carry a paid or amplified signature, most in the paid-amplified range and a few far higher, where views ran into the millions while likes stayed in the hundreds. The point is not that amplification is wrong, it is legal and common, but that a headline view count on its own tells a buyer almost nothing about how many real people the launch reached.
A benchmark works because it is aggregate. Reporting the bands, how many launches fall in each views-to-likes range, tells a buyer what normal and abnormal look like without pinning a label on any named founder. That restraint is deliberate and load-bearing here, because the underlying data names real, public launches. Distribution-amplified is a description of how reach was assembled, not an accusation, and a launch with only a partial record stays a lower-confidence reconstruction. The per-launch readings live on the RADAR hub, each tied to its public source post, so anyone can audit a single reading without the benchmark ever singling one out.
The views-per-like bands across RADAR's corpus
| Band | Views per like | Where launches land | What the engagement shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic | Near or below roughly 500 | 10 of 30 read as organic | Likes and replies keep pace with views |
| Paid-amplified | Low hundreds into the low thousands | Most tracked launches | Reach past the ceiling, plus a launch-hour quote-tweet burst |
| Heavy-amplified | Several thousand and up | The far end of the set | Views into the millions while likes stayed in the hundreds |
Across RADAR's 30 tracked launches (about 110.4 million combined views, Oct 2025 to Jun 2026), 18 carry a full forensic trace and read as verified; the rest are reconstructed from the ratio alone. Bands are aggregate, no single launch is named.
OpenAI's Sora beat ChatGPT to 1M downloads, then shut down 6 months later. The public download, revenue, and moderation data behind both halves.
Read
On an ordinary post a pod costs you some reach. On a launch it costs you the only measurement you had. LinkedIn's own trust VP explains where the penalty lands.
Read
LinkedIn's own policy forbids agreeing ahead of time to like each other's posts. Here is what earns distribution instead, and why the cadence data disagrees.
Read
