


Agencies sell effort. Marketplaces sell volume. FORKOFF Clipping sells qualified outcomes. The wedge in long form, with where each model wins.
← scroll horizontally to see more →
| Feature | FORKOFF ClippingManaged outcome agency | Marketplace (Whop, Hoodpay)Self-serve clipping marketplace |
|---|---|---|
| Operating model | Managed agency. Strategist-led brief, qualification, payouts. | Self-serve. Brand posts, clippers submit, marketplace skims. |
| Pricing denominator | $0.003 per qualified view. Only views passing all four checks. | Raw CPM on submitted views; legitimacy hidden in the rate. |
| Qualification gate | Four-stage automated gate. Reasons logged on filter. | Brand-side manual review per submission. |
| Audit trail | Append-only ledger, exportable CSV/JSON, per-view reason codes. | Dashboard counts; no per-view audit trail. |
| Time to live | <48h from accepted brief. Sandbox available by application. | Hours to set up, but qualification is brand-side ongoing. |
| Where each wins | Outcome-priced launches: protocols, AI, podcasts, consumer apps. | Raw-exposure plays where qualification is not required. |
If you are launching something where outcomes matter, an agency that prices on qualified views wins on both economics and accountability. FORKOFF is the only clipping operator that prices the qualification promise into the contract.
The qualification ledger changed how we report to the board. Real attention, verified weekly, not dashboard vanity.
Growth lead
Growth Lead, AI Infrastructure Startup

Spencer Pratt: 2 clipping campaigns, $30K spend, 25M views. First celebrity to itemize the budget. FORKOFF benchmarks: $0.003 CPQV vs $0.0012 raw CPV.

The 7-question audit framework for evaluating crypto marketing agencies. Red flag scoring, contract safeguards, and the pricing reality check.

Below 1,500 listeners per episode, three of the four monetization models produce near-zero revenue. One model works from episode one. The math, ranked.