Skip to content
FORKOFF
Managed clipping campaigns · Qualified-outcome pricing

Clipping campaigns that onlycharge you for views that actually count.

Brands pay an average of $0.003 per qualified view. verified watch-time, valid traffic, geo-routed delivery. If it doesn't qualify, it doesn't count.

14 days · paid only on qualified views$0.003 per qualified view · no retainer
5B+views processed
99.71%sustained legitimacy
$0.003avg cost per qualified view
<48hbrief to live
▸ The wedge

Agencies sell effort. Marketplaces sell volume. FORKOFF sells qualified outcomes.

Clipping is not editing. It is distribution infrastructure.

Three content signals price on an inverting ladder: the more brand-dedicated the account, the higher the CPM and the lower the volume. Editing is the cheapest, most replaceable step in the chain. The infrastructure, vetted clippers, qualification pipeline, and distribution across five platforms, is what a brand is actually buying.

What is a clipping agency

What is a clipping agency, and how does clipping pricing work?

A clipping agency is a managed service that recruits, briefs, and directs short-form editors, called clippers, who cut long-form content into platform-native clips, then reports on the results. Clipping pricing runs three ways: flat retainers, raw-view marketplaces, and outcome pricing. FORKOFF prices on outcomes at an average of $0.003 per qualified view, counting a view only after a four-stage gate checks watch-time, policy, geo, and traffic validity. The network has processed 5B+ views this way.

  1. 01
    Brief the campaign Lock geo targets, brand-safety rules, watch-time thresholds, and platform mix in writing before clips ship.
  2. 02
    Recruit and vet clippers Match clippers by niche, platform track record, and prior qualified-view history rather than follower count.
  3. 03
    Deliver episode-level briefs Each clipper receives a per-episode brief that identifies the narrative beat, target duration, and caption style.
  4. 04
    Qualify every view Each view passes four checks: watch-duration, platform policy, geo consistency, and traffic validity before it counts.
  5. 05
    Log rejections with reason codes Filtered traffic is logged with a written reason code and excluded from billing. Brands never pay for views that fail a check.
  6. 06
    Deliver audit-ready reporting Campaign closes with a CSV/JSON proof of per-view reason codes, CPQV math, and platform breakdown for finance review.
Clipping campaigns

Clipping campaigns priced on qualified views

A clipping campaign is a managed program where a brand briefs a roster of clippers to cut long-form content into platform-native short clips, then pays only for the views that pass qualification. FORKOFF runs the whole campaign: brief, clipper vetting, episode-level direction, moderation, and settlement. The difference from a self-serve tool or a raw-view marketplace is the unit you pay for. FORKOFF bills the campaign on qualified views at an average of $0.003 each, so a clipping campaign budget maps to verified watch-time and valid traffic, not impressions a dashboard inflated.

Clipping pipeline

One long video becomes paid reach on three platforms.

1The source

3 moments marked

1:47:32

2The cut
0:34

the cold-open answer

0:51

the contrarian take

0:28

the one-line proof

Hook in frame one, captions burned in, sized 9:16

3The payout
TikTok412K
Reels288K
Shorts196K

Qualified views

896,000

At $0.003

$2,688

Paid on qualified views, not on hours edited

  • Set the brief, lock the rules. Geo targets, brand-safety rules, watch-time thresholds, and platform mix go in writing before a single clip ships.
  • Pay per qualified view, not per raw view. Every view runs four checks. A view that fails any check is logged with a reason code and excluded from the campaign spend.
  • Settle against the verified proof. The campaign closes with a CSV or JSON proof of per-view reason codes and CPQV math your finance team can audit.

Clipping is how FORKOFF delivers content distribution at scale. Brands buying managed campaigns start at for brands buying clipping; estimate a budget with the CPQV calculator.

CPQV benchmarks

Clipping rates and cost per qualified view: 2026 benchmarks

Cost per qualified view, or CPQV, is the price a brand pays for one view that passes every qualification check in the campaign brief. It is the honest unit of clipping campaign cost, because it strips out the views a raw-view count would have billed you for. Across FORKOFF campaigns the average lands near $0.003 per qualified view. The figure moves with platform mix, geo targeting, and how strict the brief sets watch-time and traffic-validity thresholds, but the unit never changes: you pay for views that qualified, and the verified proof shows the ones that did not.

The full per-platform CPQV spread, sample window, and exclusion-rate methodology are published in the FORKOFF CPQV benchmark. Compare that against a per-raw-view marketplace, which bills every view that loaded, and per-seat clipping software, which charges a flat subscription no matter how the views perform; the AI tools themselves are benchmarked head to head in the OpusClip vs Vizard comparison, and the model contrast is laid out in the pricing table further down this page. A one-paragraph definition lives at what is cost per qualified view.

Entry price

What a clipping campaign costs to start

Two numbers on this page do two different jobs. One is what you buy. The other is what our campaigns have measured. Reading the second as the first is the fastest way to size a campaign wrong, so here is each one and what it is for.

The entry price, what you buy

from $3,500

The FORKOFF entry buy is Clipping Foundation: from $3,500, across three campaigns. It is the smallest managed engagement we run and the figure to plan against. Where you land above it follows scope, geo, and the volume you want.

The measured rate, what campaigns delivered

$0.003 per qualified view

This is an average FORKOFF has measured across its own managed campaigns, inside a spread of $0.0024 to $0.0038. It is first-party evidence from 5B+ views processed, and it moves with platform mix, geo targeting, and how strict the brief sets watch-time. Read it as a reference for what efficient looks like on this model.

The measured rate is proof, not a published unit to multiply a view target by. Do that arithmetic and you get a number, not a quote. Bring the outcome you want and the scope lands on the call. The per-platform spread and exclusion-rate methodology behind the measured rate are published in the FORKOFF CPQV benchmark.

The clip economy

The clip economy: why brands pay per qualified view

The clip economy is the market that formed when brands realized short clips, not polished long-form, drive most of the attention on TikTok, Reels, Shorts, and X. Clippers cut moments from podcasts, streams, and launches, post them at volume, and get paid on performance. The model went mainstream when large content owners started paying clippers directly, which pushed the question every brand now asks: which of these views are real. The clip economy rewards volume, so it also produces inflated view counts. Paying per qualified view is how a brand stays in the clip economy without paying for the noise it generates.

FORKOFF wrote up the moment the clip economy crossed into nine-figure budgets in the clip economy, explained, and broke down a real campaign in the clipping campaign cost case study. The same question drives our research: FORKOFF forensically analyzed 30 high-profile launches and found 67% carried a paid or amplified reach signature, in the Launch Authenticity Report 2026. Brands standing up their own roster can follow how to build a brand clipping network. For a launch specifically, FORKOFF produces the launch video and clips it into launch-day distribution, so the film and the amplification ship from one team. Where the long-form the clips are cut from is a recurring show rather than a one-off launch, the upstream engagement is podcast marketing services, which owns the strategy, the record, and the distribution the clip cadence then runs on.

How much does a clipping agency cost

How much does a clipping agency cost?

A clipping agency costs whatever its pricing unit makes you pay for. FORKOFF prices managed clipping on qualified views rather than a flat retainer or raw-view count, billing an average of $0.003 per qualified view, so the budget tracks verified watch-time and valid traffic instead of impressions a dashboard inflated. The total moves with platform mix, geo targeting, and how strict the brief sets watch-time and traffic-validity thresholds, but the unit never changes.

Estimate a budget against your own view target with the CPQV calculator, or see the model contrast against per-raw-view marketplaces and per-seat software in the agency vs marketplace explainer. Weighing named managed networks? See the full nine-agency ranking in the best clipping agency comparison, or read the clipping culture alternatives breakdown. Comparing against self-serve software instead? The 10 OpusClip alternatives ranking sorts tools and managed shops on how much of the chain each one owns. The brief answer to how much a clipping agency costs sets out the pricing units side by side. The model question underneath it, why a few agencies bill per delivered outcome while most bill a monthly retainer, is answered at agencies that price on outcomes instead of retainers. The six checks that separate a real distribution partner from a good-looking landing page are laid out in how to choose a clipping agency. Every short question we get asked about clipping, pricing, usage rights and attribution is answered in one place in the answers library.

Is a clipping agency worth it

Is a clipping agency worth it?

A clipping agency is worth it for a brand that wants short-form output at volume without building an in-house editing team and without paying for views that never qualified. The managed model handles brief creation, clipper vetting, episode-level direction, moderation, and per-view reporting, which is the work that decides whether a clip program produces real watch-time or just an inflated view count. FORKOFF has processed 5B+ views through this model at a 99.71% sustained legitimacy rate, and excludes every view that fails a qualification check with a written reason code, so the brand only pays for traffic that passed.

Brands buying managed campaigns start at for brands buying clipping; the per-view methodology is published in the qualified views methodology. SaaS teams weighing a clipping agency for SaaS launches can scope the brief at clipping for SaaS brands. Vetting trust before budget? Are clipping agencies legit answers that question directly.

AI clipping agency

What is an AI clipping agency, and how is it different from a clipping platform?

An AI clipping agency is a managed team that uses AI clipping tools to cut long-form content at volume, then adds a human qualification layer on top so a brand pays only for views that pass. It sits between two other options. A clipping platform, or clipping software, is self-serve: you upload a video and the tool returns clips, but nobody vets the output or the views behind them. A raw-view clipper agency or marketplace pays clippers on every view a dashboard reports, qualified or not. FORKOFF runs as a managed AI clipping agency: AI tooling handles the cutting speed, and a four-stage qualification gate decides which views count, at an average of $0.003 per qualified view. The network has processed 5B+ views this way at a 99.71% sustained legitimacy rate.

Picking the best clipping platform for your team comes down to whether you want to run the work yourself or hand it to an agency. Self-serve tools are compared head to head in the OpusClip vs Vizard comparison and the 10 OpusClip alternatives ranking. Managed clipping agencies are ranked in the best clipping agency comparison. If you already run in-house clippers, FORKOFF can layer its qualification engine over your existing roster, so you keep the team and add the proof.

Clipping and the creator economy, by the numbers

Short-form clipping is where attention and ad budget moved.

Clipping is not a side tactic anymore. Short-form video is the format buyers watch and the format marketers say returns the most, and the creator economy behind it is now a hundreds-of-billions market. Here is the sourced picture behind the managed clipping motion on this page, every figure from a named source with the year it was reported.

  • The creator economy was a roughly 250 billion dollar total addressable market in 2023 and is projected to nearly double to about 480 billion dollars by 2027. (Goldman Sachs, 2023)

  • There are an estimated 50 million creators worldwide, a base expected to grow at a 10 to 20 percent compound annual growth rate over five years, with short-form video monetization named as a primary driver. (Goldman Sachs, 2023)

  • United States creator advertising spend more than doubled from 13.9 billion dollars in 2021 to 29.5 billion dollars in 2024, and is projected to reach 37 billion dollars in 2025, growing about four times faster than the total media industry. (IAB, 2025)

  • Short-form video returns the highest ROI of any content format and ranks first for lead generation and engagement, and marketers said they planned to invest in it more than any other media format. (HubSpot 2024 Video Marketing Report, 2024)

  • YouTube Shorts averages more than 70 billion daily views, up from about 30 billion in 2021, one of the fastest-growing formats in the platform's history. (YouTube, 2024)

  • FORKOFF has processed 5B+ views through its managed clipping network at a 99.71 percent sustained non-bot legitimacy rate, billing an average of $0.003 per qualified view, with every rejected view logged and excluded from spend. (FORKOFF, 2026)

First-party data

The FORKOFF qualified-view network, by the numbers

5B+
qualified views processed across the network
99.71%
sustained non-bot legitimacy on views that counted
$0.003
average cost per qualified view (CPQV)

FORKOFF has processed more than 5 billion qualified views through a four-stage qualification gate that checks watch-duration, platform policy, geo consistency, and traffic validity on every view, holding a 99.71% sustained non-bot legitimacy rate on the views that counted, at an average of $0.003 per qualified view. Every rejected view is logged with a written reason code and excluded from billing.

Source, FORKOFF first-party data: Clipping CPQV benchmark and qualified-views methodology.

Brands that ran on the FORKOFF qualified-view ledger
IO.NETTaikoMovementSolanaBaseBerachainCertiKStory ProtocolWormholeSomniaOktoHashedIO.NETTaikoMovementSolanaBaseBerachainCertiKStory ProtocolWormholeSomniaOktoHashed
12 active campaignsIN · SEA · US · MENAB2C + crypto + DePIN
Distribution

Distribute
everywhere.

Four platforms, one campaign. FORKOFF's clipper pool ships your content to TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and X. every clip routed to the surface where it earns the qualified view.

Social
X / Twitter
Short-video
TikTok
Short-video
Instagram
Short-video
YouTube
4Platforms supported
30+Geos routed
AutoFormat adapt per platform
See routing logic
Find Clippers
JK
SM
DH
Join 150+ brands
TikTok · 2.3M
QV-counted
Reels · 1.8M
Geo NA-EU
Shorts · 1.4M
Moderated
TikTok · 720K
Live
Shorts · 612K
Top 1%
Reels · 540K
Anti-bot
Reels · 940K
Settled

Your hunt for clipping
ends here.

Cure raw-view landFire your ad networkDrop the spreadsheet ledgerSkip the influencer agency
Three clipping pricing models

Three clipping pricing models.
Only one pays you for outcomes.

01

Ad networks

count impressions

Ad networks count impressions. You pay every time a view is delivered, even when nobody watches. Reach is measured. Whether anyone cared is not.

Pay for ads that never get watched.

02

DIY clipping tools

count raw views

Self-serve clippers count raw views. The number includes scroll-by views, bot traffic, geo-mismatched audiences, and sub-second exposures. Low rate-card price, but the number is a vibe. not a receipt.

Pay for views that never qualify.

03Operator-grade

FORKOFF Clipping

counts qualified views

FORKOFF counts qualified views. Every view passes four checks. watch duration, policy compliance, geo consistency, traffic validity. before it counts toward a brand's spend or a clipper's payout. The receipt is auditable. The CPV is real.

Pay only on outcomes.

WatchPolicyGeoTraffic
The qualified-view definition

What counts
as a qualified view.

A view is qualified only when all four checks pass. If any layer rejects it, the view is logged, attributed to a reason code, and excluded from both spend and payout. 99.71% of views on the ledger have cleared all four.

Active check · WATCH
99.71%Sustained legitimacy across the FORKOFF ledger. Share of views that cleared all four checks.

WATCH

Duration meets the threshold

WATCH

TikTok 1.5s baseline · YouTube 30% retention · Instagram Reels 2s baseline. Threshold is set in the brief.

POLICY

Disputed claims, restricted categories, and policy edges get rejected with a written reason. Never silently filtered.

GEO

Views from non-target countries are logged but never counted. Spillover happens only when the brand authorizes it.

TRAFFIC

Datacenter UAs, viewing patterns, and post-campaign cohorts reviewed. Multi-layer because a single check is gameable.

Counts as qualified
  • 12s watch on a 30s TikTok in target geo
  • 35% retention on a YouTube Short, India target hit
  • Real device, real account, all platform signals match
  • Brand-safe content, no restricted claims
Does not count
  • 0.4s scroll-by with a real account
  • View from a datacenter UA in target geo
  • Geo-mismatched view (UAE viewer, India target)
  • Disputed brand claim flagged by moderation
The qualification engine

Four layers.
Zero guesswork.

99.71% legitimacy is not a marketing claim. It is the rate measured after every layer has run. Brands never pay for filtered traffic. Clippers flagged in any layer are removed and excluded from payout, with a written reason.

LAYER 1 OF 4 · PRE-SUBMISSION

Clipper identity + history + graph signals

Clipper identity verification, account age, platform history, cross-platform graph signals. Filters bad actors before they get in the door.

account_age > 90dgraph_score ≥ 0.6no_brand_block
87.4%pass

5.3M passed

raw applicants6.1M

4-layer funnel

L1
87.4%
L2
73.6%
L3
68.5%
L4
68.3%
How it works · 3-step pipeline

Brief intake on day 1. Geo-routed clipper pool live within 48 hours. Auto-settled payouts once moderation clears. Every step on the same audit-ready ledger.

The full loadout, on four screens.

PHASE 01[PRE-FLIGHT]
01
BRIEF

A campaign with a reason to run.

Deliverables (4)

  • Define objective + target geos
  • Qualification logic per platform
  • Brand-safety rules
  • Feasibility review in 24 hours
PHASE 02[MATCH]
02
GEO-ROUTING

Targeted clippers, not random ones.

Deliverables (4)

  • Match by geography + niche
  • Match by platform strength
  • Payout math visible to clippers before accept
  • Eligibility criteria locked in writing
PHASE 03[GATE]
03
MODERATION

Every clip, every reason.

Deliverables (4)

  • Policy check + brand-safety pass
  • Format + brief-match check
  • Invalid-traffic signal review
  • Rejection comes with a written reason code
PHASE 04[TELEMETRY]
04
REPORT + PAYOUT

Real-time outcomes, auto-settle.

Deliverables (4)

  • Qualified-view count tracked live
  • Clippers paid automatically once moderation clears
  • Brand sees CPQV + budget burn + clipper attribution
  • Audit-ready proof export (CSV/JSON)
Run the number

Calculate your cost per qualified view before you brief a campaign.

Enter your budget, platform mix, and qualified-view threshold to see the CPQV a clipping campaign would target. It is the same math FORKOFF prices clipping work against, so you walk into the brief knowing what efficient looks like.

Drop in your own inputs to model the cost per qualified view a managed clipping campaign would aim to hit.
Clipping fit diagnostic

Strong fit when you have the footage.
Skip when any disqualifier fires.

Who you are
  • You already have long-form worth cutting: gameplay, a podcast back-catalogue, streams, webinars, or event footage.
  • You sell into one of the segments that buy clipping, in the order 101 public campaigns ranked them: games, publishers and esports; podcasts, shows and media brands; AI tools and founder-led B2B; business educators, coaches and course sellers; streamers and personal-brand creators; consumer apps with real footage; B2B SaaS and dev tools that already record a show; ecommerce and DTC brands; music artists and labels; fintech and trading educators; crypto and web3. Games and podcasts carried the deepest budgets and the highest spend-through.
  • You want reach billed on a delivered qualified view rather than a platform impression.
  • You would rather read a clipper-level dashboard than a monthly summary.
What FORKOFF delivers
  • Qualified views as the billed unit, screened for bots, duplicates and geo mismatch before any of them count.
  • A clipper-level dashboard we will open live on the call, with per-creator scores rather than a headline number.
  • 99.71% sustained traffic legitimacy across the network.
  • Geo-routed distribution across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X and Facebook.
Not the right fit
  • ×You have no long-form to clip yet. Clipping needs a source, and no budget substitutes for one. Record a short scripted set first and come back. We would rather say that now than three weeks into a campaign.
  • ×You want bought views or bot traffic. That is precisely what the qualified-view definition exists to exclude.
  • ×You need a cost-per-booked-call unit. Reach cannot enter that arithmetic honestly, so that is a Founder Funnel engagement, not a clipping one.
Start small

Run a sandbox campaign

Fourteen days, paid only on qualified views, no minimum term. It is the cheapest way to see the shape of the data before committing to a campaign, and the fastest way to find out whether your footage clips well.

  1. 01Sandbox
  2. 02Engagement
  3. 03Compound
By application
Apply for the sandbox
Head-to-head

How an operator-grade
clipping agency compares.

Side-by-side against the platforms in market today. Categories chosen by buyer-team request. not picked to flatter us.

FeatureFORKOFF Clippingoperator-gradeOpusClipself-serve SaaSWhop / Hoodpayclipper marketplaceVizard / Klapself-serve SaaS
Counts qualified views (4 checks)
Geo-routingpartial
Moderation pipeline
Anti-bot ledgerpartial
Visible payout math (before accept)
Pricing modelPer QV ($0.003)Per raw viewPer raw viewSaaS monthly
Best forB2C + crypto brandsSolo clippersClipper marketplacesSolo clippers

Honest framing: each platform is best for a different buyer. We name who.

Full buyer's matrix on forkoff.xyz/blog
Price my campaign

Bring your target geo and the monthly view volume you want. You get the qualified-view rate on the call, not a proposal a week later.

Case study · 14-day campaign

Crypto-native consumer brand · India + SEA launch · Q1 2026

Brand anonymized at NDA request · numbers verified by FORKOFF qualification ledger

4.2M
qualified views
$12,600
brand spend
$0.003
avg CPV
99.71%
legitimacy
Brief
Brief
Drive measurable awareness across India + Southeast Asia
Target geos
IN · ID · VN · PH
Watch threshold
TikTok 2s baseline · YouTube Shorts 35% retention
Duration
14 days · Q1 2026
Result
  • 4.2M qualified views. out of 6.1M raw submitted (68.8% qualification rate)
  • 99.71% sustained legitimacy across 14 days
  • 142 clippers paid · $7,140 total clipper earnings
  • $12,600 brand spend · 100% paid on qualified outcomes
  • Zero charge for filtered or non-qualifying views

What this looks like when it runs

Each engagement below names the company, the window the work ran in, and the numbers it returned. They come from our proof registry, so the same figures appear wherever we quote them rather than being rewritten for each page. Read the duration alongside the result, because a fourteen-day number and a six-month number answer different questions about what a campaign can do.

Crypto-native consumer brand (IN + SEA)

14 days, Q1 2026

qualified views
4.2M

qualified views

qualification rate
68.8%

qualification rate

legitimacy
99.71%

legitimacy

cost per qualified view
$0.003

cost per qualified view

  • 4.2M qualified views out of 6.1M raw submitted (68.8% qualification rate)
  • 99.71% sustained legitimacy across 14 days
  • 142 operators paid on qualified outcomes only, zero charge for filtered views

Lark Davis

14 days, Q3 2026

qualified views
3.7M

qualified views

qualification rate
61.4%

qualification rate

legitimacy
89%

legitimacy

cost per qualified view
$0.003

cost per qualified view

  • 3.7M qualified views out of 6.1M raw submitted (61.4% qualification rate)
  • 89% sustained legitimacy across the full campaign window
  • 142 operators paid on qualified outcomes only, zero charge for filtered views

Realbet

14 days, Q3 2026

qualified views
3.8M

qualified views

qualification rate
62%

qualification rate

legitimacy
89.9%

legitimacy

cost per qualified view
$0.003

cost per qualified view

  • 3.8M qualified views out of 6.1M raw submitted (62% qualification rate)
  • 89.9% sustained legitimacy across the full campaign window
  • 142 operators paid on qualified outcomes only, zero charge for filtered views
Book a 30-minute call

Walk through what numbers like these would look like for your business.

" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
Testimonials

Real results. Named campaigns.

13 active days of distribution. 1.19 million views. 27 new paid subscribers at $50 a month. And 83% of the prior month's subscribers kept paying on top of that. This is a subscriber acquisition engine, not a one-time promotion.
C

Crypto Lark

YouTube Creator, The Inner Circle, Lark Davis · The Inner Circle

Brand-side
Finance approved the spend the day we showed them the cohort report. A screenshot of views is not attribution. A per-view audit ledger with reason codes is.
M

Marketing director

Marketing Director, DePIN Protocol

Brand-side
Submitted Tuesday. Earned Friday. The payout math was exactly what they showed me before I accepted the brief. I have run three campaigns now. Same experience each time.
C

Clipper

Clipper, TikTok · India + SEA

Clipper-side
US-only mode was underperforming. We opened India and Southeast Asia in the routing. Same budget, 4.2 million qualified views over 14 days. The CPV came in at a third of what we had been paying.
H

Head of campaigns

Head of Campaigns, Crypto consumer brand

Brand-side
$1,290MRR added in 13 active days · March 2026
99.71%Legitimacy rate on the cohort
<48hBrief accepted to first payout
4.2MQualified views · 14-day campaign
Featured campaigns
Voices from the field

What operators say about qualified-view clipping.

Clip economy is moving toward outcome-priced. We pay for verified attention now, not raw impressions. Anything else is selling air.

Brandon Olsen

Crypto-native brand, ops lead

Spent $40K on a clipping campaign last quarter. Dashboard reported 80M views. Real qualified watch-time was closer to 6M. The industry needs a real standard.

Ava Sterling

Agency, paid social strategist

If your clipping spend isn't gated by a watch threshold + geo + bot check, you're funding inventory the platforms throw away. Burned us once, never again.

Felix Ortega

B2C founder, Series A

Best campaign we ran this year: paid per qualified view, not per raw view. Same budget, 3.4× more retained attention. The unit of account matters.

Grace Park

Token launch, growth PM

Our agency report shows 12M views. Internal mixpanel pulled in 3.1M sessions. The gap is real and growing. Anyone using a third-party qualified-view ledger?

Paraphrased, r/marketing

Burned $80K on a pure-volume campaign last quarter. Looked clean on the dashboard. Three weeks later we're chasing reasons. Anyone running on per-qualified-view pricing yet?

Paraphrased, r/cryptocurrency

Switched off the random-pool platforms last month. Hate the lottery. Got onto a managed network where eligibility is in writing before I accept. CPM math is clearer, payouts auto-settle. Glad to take less for clarity.

Paraphrased, r/CreatorEconomy

ICP · Brand-side buyer

For Brands. Run measurable clipping
without paying for fake reach.

Who you are
  • Growth, marketing, or community lead at a consumer / fintech / crypto / Web3 brand
  • You sign off on CPQV and qualified-view budgets
  • You have a brief but no in-house clipper network. Or one that's underperforming.
  • You've been burned by raw-view counting, bot-traffic spikes, or geo-mismatched reporting
What FORKOFF delivers
  • Geo-routed campaigns across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube (Shorts + long-form), X, Facebook
  • Operator-grade dashboard with clipper-level attribution
  • Audit-ready legitimacy ledger. Every filtered view logged with a reason code.
  • Pay only on qualified outcomes. Never on raw submission volume.
Sandbox offer · 14 days · paid only on qualified views

Sandbox campaign. Refund the rest if QV floor isn't hit.

We design the brief with you, run a 14-day micro-campaign, and report qualified outcomes against your CPV target. If qualified views fall below the agreed floor, the unspent budget is refunded. Operational fee disclosed in advance.

Run a sandbox campaign
ICP · Clipper-side operator

For Clippers. Submit clips.
See the math. Get paid.

Eligibility · platform-specific
TikTok5K+ followers OR a 90-day verified track record
Instagram3K+ followers · last-30d engagement ≥ 3%
YouTube Shorts5K subscribers OR 50K shorts-views in 30 days
YouTube long-form2K subscribers · ≥ 25% retention on a clip ≥ 60s
X / Twitter2K followers · video-history present
Facebook5K page followers

Eligibility is platform-specific because qualification math is platform-specific. Fit, quality, and verifiable performance matter more than raw follower count.

Payout math · visible before accept

Payout = (Qualified Views ÷ 1,000) × Campaign Rate

ex: 20,000 qualified views @ $3 CPM = $60

Anonymized · last 30 days
Top 1% · 30d median
$4,800
Top 10% · 30d median
$1,200
All-clipper 30d median
$185
Last 30 days · total paid
$14,800

Clipping campaign questions, answered

What is a qualified view?

A view that passes four checks set by the campaign brief: watch duration, policy compliance, geo consistency, and traffic validity. If any layer rejects it, the view is logged with a reason code and excluded from both spend and payout.

How fast can a brand launch?

Most campaigns go live within 24-48 hours of brief acceptance.

Can we test a campaign before committing to a full retainer?

Yes. Start on the cheapest content signal, logo placement over existing volume, before committing to dedicated brand accounts at 12-20x that rate. The Clipping Foundation pilot goes entirely to clippers with no management fee, targeting 1-1.2M qualified views across 50-60 accounts.

Which platforms are supported?

Instagram, TikTok, YouTube (Shorts and long-form), X, and Facebook.

How is FORKOFF Clipping different from OpusClip, Vizard, or Whop?

OpusClip and Vizard are self-serve clipping SaaS. Whop and Hoodpay are clipper marketplaces that count raw views. FORKOFF Clipping is managed and counts only qualified views: every view filtered through four checks before it counts.

Do clippers need a large audience?

No. Fit, quality, and verifiable performance matter more than raw follower count.

Why was my clip rejected?

Every rejection includes a reason code: policy issue, brief mismatch, format mismatch, or invalid traffic signals.

How are clippers paid?

Payout equals qualified views divided by 1,000, times the campaign CPM rate. Rates are visible before brief acceptance.

Can I run on my own clippers?

Yes. FORKOFF Clipping can run a managed campaign on a brand's existing clipper roster, with the qualification engine and reporting layered on top.

Who owns the social accounts our clips run through?

It depends on the tier. On the clipper-network model, the clipper owns the account and the brand rents the reach. On the dedicated brand-account tier, accounts are created for that brand rather than drawn from shared inventory, so ownership and any handover terms belong there. We say up front which model a given quote is for.

Can we control what content our clips appear next to?

On the mass clipper-network signal, a clip lands on someone else's page alongside whatever else that page posts, so we cannot guarantee adjacency. The dedicated brand-account tier is built for exactly this: every neighbouring post on that account is also the brand's own, which is total adjacency control by construction and part of why that tier carries a higher CPM.

What happens to filtered traffic?

Filtered traffic is logged with a reason code and excluded from spend. Brands never pay for traffic that fails any qualification check.

Can I export the qualification ledger for an audit?

Yes. Every campaign produces an audit-ready CSV/JSON export with per-view reason codes.

Is FORKOFF a clipping platform or a clipping agency?

FORKOFF is a managed AI clipping agency, not a self-serve clipping platform. Self-serve platforms and clipping software return clips and leave verification to you. FORKOFF uses AI clipping tools for speed, then runs a four-stage qualification gate so a brand pays only for views that pass, at an average of $0.003 per qualified view.

The brand line

Stop paying for views
that never count.

Run measurable clipping campaigns priced on qualified views only. 14-day sandbox available. paid only on qualified views, refund the rest.

Are you a clipper? Join the network
FORKOFF Clipping · Full surface

Every clipping page on FORKOFF.

Region hubs, conversion pSEO grids, podcast verticals, ICP pages, free tools, and the vs/alternatives compare matrix. Every link goes to a real page on this domain.

86pages cataloged6categories19vs-vendor comparisonsUpdated 2026-07-01

FORKOFF vs vendors

19 pages

Comparison + pricing teardowns

Head-to-head with every named competitor in the clipping category. Pricing and review teardowns for the four most-searched vendors.

vs comparisons

Pricing + review teardowns

Need a page that isn't in the grid?

Custom landing page for your campaign scenario.

If your scenario doesn't map to one of the 86 pages above, FORKOFF can scope a custom landing page for your campaign before brief acceptance.

Talk to a strategist